|
7.48
Extracts from a letter by Malcolm Forsythe, in London, UK,
to his friend Anton, in the Ukraine, recalling some of the events
of 2012.
December 30th, 2012
Dear Anton,
What a strange and wonderful year this has been ! While half
the country has been worrying itself sick about the potential
break-up of the Antarctic ice-sheets, the other half has been
wrapping itself in hypersensory music and celebrations of the
star system Sirius. It's hard enough to make any sense of it here
in England, so I can't imagine what it must seem like to you.
Did you manage to get enough potatoes in, before the big freeze-up
? Are you able to keep yourselves warm ? It must be terrible,
coping without regular power.
As you know, I live with a foot in both camps, here in London.
One day I'm in conference with the Cabinet Planning Secretariat
down in Whitehall, scheming up new ways to make people reduce
their use of fossil fuels, and the next day I'm running a workshop
on cyber-consciousness in Richmond's leafy suburbs. It's quite
a relief to get the occasional Sunday off when I can go up onto
Hampstead Heath with Sonya and the kids and enjoy a normal afternoon
of swimming, sunbathing and play-fighting on the grass.
But what is normal any more ? Things seem to be changing so fast
I sometimes think that 'normal' is a state of mind that exists
only in our memories. You have to forget what we have recently
remembered, to rediscover normal.
We used to think that it was normal to exist in a body that was
separate from other bodies, with a mind that was separate and
a set of emotions that were separate. The whole idea of privacy,
along with the cultural norms and literature of the 20th century,
was based on these assumptions. Distance from others was an essential
part of our self-identity, at least here in England. I know it
was different in the Caribbean, and most of Africa.
What's been happening of late is that people have been "remembering",
or "re-membering", re-connecting to the larger membranes that
link us together, and link us to nature. People have been realizing
that the 'normal' state of isolation and privacy which our culture
imposed on us is an 'abnormal' state of being, which cuts us off
from each other and denies us the thousand possibilities of kinship
and harmony.
If I had to put a date to it, I would say that it started with
the arrival of Compost Modernism, at the beginning of the millennium.
Modernism was fine. It broke up mould of the old 19th century
romantic imagination, and freed us up to see the world in new
ways. It was fresh air, that said "anything is possible." Postmodernism,
by contrast, was a piece of schlock. It was like the baroque,
after classicism's calm geometry. The way I perceived it, along
with most of the people I knew, was that postmodernism was completely
stuck in its head, or rather its image of what the idea of its
head should have been. It was so busy deconstructing everything
that there was nothing left that could be said to have an authentic
reality of its own, apart from its own replica. By the end of
the 20th century, it had become so separated from anything real
that it was like a nihilistic phantom, awaiting its own implosion.
It was compost modernism which imploded it, with spades. It came
out of nowhere, celebrating everything that was real through participatory
music, dance and song, crazy home-made sculptures and street poetry.
'Participation, not performance' was its catch-phrase, as it joyfully
invited everyone to join in. The important thing in compost modernism
is to be authentic, not to pretend. An authentic rendering by
a street musician who is fully engaged in the music is felt to
be more desirable than a stage performance where the actors or
musicians are just going through the motions. Compost modernism
took the sticks and bones of postmodernism and tossed them into
the compost heap of life, to be eaten by worms and regenerated
into new life, ready to start over again. It was dirty, refreshing,
funky, amusing, and very 'down here'. It was art that came from
the belly, not the brain.
Community singing has been a big part of compost modernism, with
new choirs bursting out everywhere. Breaking the traditional rules
of modern choral singing, which say that you have to know how
to read a score and be almost a trained musician before you start,
the new singing has opened up the world to everyone who had always
wanted to sing, but who felt intimidated by the high professional
standards of performance art. In the new choirs, you learn the
music by ear, the way it was for cultures all over the world,
before written music. Paradoxically, this has produced some very
fine choirs.
Before the turn of the millennia, it was very rare for people
to sing together at a party or a shared meal. Today, it is rare
to go to a party where people don't sing together. Most
of it is oral, but there's a lot of written music coming back.
The new electronic music pads are a big help. They're small, hand-held
screens which let you download whatever music, words and notation
you want off the Internet, emphasize whichever harmony line you
are singing, transpose the key, even read the words in a different
language, if you want to. The great thing is that they allow you
to learn your harmony lines between rehearsals, saving the rehearsal
time for texture and quality work.
Someone calculated recently that the public's repertoire of shared
songs (songs where the average crowd knows enough of the words
to join in) had increased to 300, from a low of 50 around the
year 2000. It's not just English language songs, either - it's
South African, Mexican, Caribbean, Russian, Hawaiian, Native American,
Aborigine songs. It's neat how the singing has become a part of
everyday life. I was walking down Regent Street a couple of weeks
ago, in the middle of London, singing a tune to yourself, and
a total stranger started harmonizing. We paused to harmonize off
each other, and before we know it there was a whole concert happening,
with other people joining in. It's a great excuse for being late
for a meeting - "Sorry - I got caught up in a concert."
Some people don't like it, of course, so now we've got song-free
cafés where you can have a quiet conversation without being
disturbed. There are even song-free railway coaches, and taxis.
They're the exception, however, not the rule. The movies have
been quite transformed by it all. We took the children to see
the new movie, 'Ocean', the other night, and right the
middle of the emotional scene where the islanders meet up again,
after being scattered as refugees, the whole audience joined in
singing the music, which was the Chorus of the Hebrew Slaves
from Verdi's Nabucco, with all the harmonies, It was just
stunning. They ran the words as subtitles, to encourage us to
join in. The singing is transforming all the major sports. All
the big tennis stars have their own songs now, which their fans
serenade them with, as British fans have done for their soccer
teams for years.
Let me tell you about an open air concert we went to up on Hampstead
Heath, one balmy summer's night last August. The second half of
the concert was devoted to choral music, with lots of opportunity
to join in, finishing up with Jerusalem, and then Amazing
Grace. I must tell you, Anton, to hear 40,000 people sing
Amazing Grace in full harmony, fading to a whisper as the
sun sets across the horizon to the west, has to be one of the
most memorable musical experiences you could ever wish for. There
has been something very special about this year which that evening
captured. It is as if the inner geography of our hearts is being
re-arranged. The colder mountain ranges of separation and pride
are moving back, and a beautiful green valley is opening up in
the foreground, with a river flowing through it.
So let me tell you about the 7.48 work that I've been involved
in, which you were asking about. Paradoxically, it fits very closely
with the spirit of the year.
As you know, the Earth is approximately 40,000 kilometers in
circumference, and electro-magnetic waves circle the world's magnetic
field at 300,000 kilometers per second, or 7.48 cycles per second.
In its normal alert state, the human brain operates at around
14 cycles per second. At 11 cycles per second (alpha waves), you
begin to feel peaceful and relaxed, and then as you fall asleep,
you move through theta waves (8 - 6 cycles per second) to delta
waves (4-6 cycles per second).
It's easy to produce alpha waves in a conscious state, but much
more difficult to produce theta or delta waves. The hypothesis
behind our 7.48 experiments is that if we can slow the brain to
7.48 cycles per second, and then manage to hold it there, the
brain's rhythms will harmonize with the electro-magnetic waves
and use them to communicate around the planet in a clear, undisturbed
way. I know that might sound ridiculous, but it isn't totally
mumbo-jumbo. Here at the Noetic Academy, we work on the hypothesis
that all nature is connected, and that plants and animals have
continual, ongoing telesensory awareness of the world around them.
As humans, we share the same ability, but when we developed speech,
the frontal lobes of the brain created an overlay on top of the
older brain, which pushed our telepathic awareness back into the
unconscious, where it remains to this day. It still comes out
in an emergency, like the mother who knows instinctively if one
of her children is in serious trouble, however far away. For the
most part, however, it's buried. In evolutionary terms, language
was a far more efficient way of communicating, which had better
survival value. So our telepathic abilities became lost in the
unconscious, buried beneath our verbal abilities.
The 7.48 techniques that we have been using involve meditation,
relaxation and hypnosis to help our subjects retain consciousness
in what would normally be a sleep state, and still transmit and
receive images, intuitions or emotions. We use biofeedback to
tell them when they are approaching the 7.48 level, encouraging
the mind to lock onto that wavelength. Cybermind technology, we
call it. The difficulty is that it is really hard to retain consciousness
at such a slow level of brain activity, we have come to the conclusion
that it probably takes years of training in meditation to gain
sufficient control over your consciousness to move below alpha
without falling asleep.
So our next step was to pay a visit to the Himalayas above Rishikesh,
where there are dozens of yogis living in ashrams and caves who
have been practising meditation and inner consciousness technologies
for all their lives (all their thousands of lives, for all I know).
I wasn't able to go because of my other commitments, but if our
hypothesis is right, we may be receiving some pretty startling
news sometime soon. The Indian government is already talking to
its lawyers about the possibility of claiming patent-rights on
behalf of the yogis on all field consciousness technologies, saying
that they have known about them for millennia, which makes the
intellectual property of the Indian people. They want to make
sure we don't somehow steal them, and sell them for a profit.
So now there's a legal debate going on as to whether human consciousness
should be treated as a shared heritage, for the whole world to
enjoy, or whether a particular country can claim ownership to
certain cybermind technologies. I just pray that Mongrando doesn't
try to cash in, claiming there's a genetic foundation to the technologies
for which they already have the patent. A group of Mexican shamans
has jumped in too, claiming that they have also been doing this
kind of work for millennia, and should have similar rights. The
last we heard, the Tibetan Government in Exile has declared a
similar interest, so it's unlikely that the Indian government
will get away with sole proprietary rights.
There was an amusing piece in the Guardian recently, speculating
what would happen if the Indian government granted its yogis a
patent on psychospace technologies. The writer suggested that
a yogic patrol would have to be established, and that anyone found
operating in the 7.48 zone without a license would be psycho-arrested.
The judges, jury and media would all have to be trained as yogis,
of course - it could become quite a growth area for the Indian
economy !
More seriously, a right wing Hindu nationalist group has been
making disturbing noises about the western exploitation of traditional
Hindu knowledge. For thousands of years, they say, while we westerners
were wandering around in bearskins, Indian yogis were perfecting
the technologies of psychospace, developing profound understandings
about syntropic field consciousness. And it's true - some of the
scientists we work with find it very hard to admit that the yogis
have beaten them to it by thousands of years. Have you ever read
Alexandra David Neel's With Mystics and Magicians in Tibet
or Paramahansa Yogananda's Autobiography of a Yogi ? They
make it totally clear that the west is far behind the yogis in
spiritual technology, just as they are behind the west in physical
technology.
In addition to all this excitement, we've been getting some interesting
preliminary results which seem to indicate that some of the people
who reach 7.48 are experiencing short-term precognition, seeing
into the future. We're hypothesizing that while consciousness
is travelling the 7.48 circuit at the speed of light, it has the
ability to sidestep the four-dimensional continuum and unlock
itself from the constraints of time. We know that time is not
fixed, that it goes faster or slower depending on the speed you're
travelling at, so it seems to follow that 7.48 consciousness might
not be bound by time. It all makes for a fascinating year. If
I can master the 7.48 cybermind technology myself, I might drop
by to see you yesterday.
***
Wearing my other hat as a government adviser on climate change
issues, our meetings at the cabinet planning secretariat have
been increasingly concerned by the global deterioration of the
climate, and everything that this means. Because of the rising
global sea levels, Venice is losing its century-old battle to
protect its heritage, and some of the smaller islands in the Pacific
are already disappearing. In British Columbia and Washington State,
the rivers are so warm that the salmon are only able to migrate
upstream because of the thousands of tons of ice their governments
are releasing into the rivers at spawning time. Up in the Arctic,
because of disappearing ice-flows, the polar bear population has
fallen by 40% since the turn of the century. Meanwhile in Australia,
Sydney Harbour froze over for the first time in living memory
last June, and millions of sheep died in the blizzards which blanketed
the country. In Greenland they have alpine flowers which no-one
has seen before - and you had that terrible flooding, in the Ukraine.
The Greeks would probably say that the Gods were very angry.
In northern Canada and Siberia, the melting tundra is a big concern,
not just because it is fracturing the oil and gas pipelines which
traverse the tundra, but because it is unlocking the methane which
has sat frozen for millennia. As a greenhouse gas, methane is
23 times more potent than carbon dioxide. The item that is causing
the most concern, however, is Antarctica. Seventeen years ago,
when scientists first raised their concern that the West Antarctic
ice-sheet might be breaking up, threatening global flooding on
a massive scale, nobody paid much attention. But last year, new
data was released which showed that the speed of the break-up
had increased, which explains why the world's sea level has been
rising faster than scientists expected. If the whole Western Antarctic
Ice Sheet broke up, we could be looking at a 20 feet rise in sea
level by 2060. If you add in the East Antarctic Ice Sheet, however,
which some scientists are saying that we should, the global sea
level could rise by 65 feet over 200 years. The implications are
appalling, since so many people below or close to the 65 feet
level, and so much of the world's food is grown there.
Here in England, we would lose most of our flat east coast, along
with areas of Cheshire, Somerset, Oxfordshire and Gloucestershire.
Most of central London, where I work, would be under water. Across
the Channel in Europe, most of Holland, Belgium and Denmark would
disappear, along with northern Germany from Bremen to Berlin.
Ireland would become a patchwork of tiny islands. Italy would
lose most of the Po Valley from Venice to Milan, along with Rome
and Naples. Our ancestors built their cities at the mouths of
coastal rivers to make use of the fertile land, little imagining
how the consequences of future technological progress would combine
with an ignorance of planetary ecology.
In your part of the world, in the Ukraine, Odessa and most of
the Crimea will disappear, unless there is some way to dam the
Bosphorus at Istanbul. You'll probably be ok where you are in
Kiev, but further north, Latvia and Estonia will be in huge trouble.
Across the Atlantic in the USA, the Sacramento and San Joachin
Valleys, where California grows most of its food, would flood
as the sea crept in from San Francisco Bay. In the east, the entire
seabord from New York to Florida would go under, and the Mississippi
Basin would disappear into the Gulf of Mexico.
In China, the massively populated coastal plains of the Yellow
and Yangtse Rivers would flood as the ocean moved in. In India
and Bangladesh, the same would apply to the delta of the Ganges
and Brahmaputra rivers, the most densely populated region on the
Earth.
Here in England, they are publishing maps which show the likely
extent of the flooding, and property prices have started to react.
It's easy to create the maps - you just program a GIS system to
follow the 20 feet or the 65 feet contour lines, and print out
the results.
I can clearly remember my personal reaction when the first maps
came out. Cairo, Beijing, Tokyo, Bangkok, London, New York, San
Francisco, Venice, Rome - they are all at or below the 65 feet
level. So too are Calcutta, Dacca, Stockholm, Copenhagen, St Petersburg,
Avignon, Seville, Lisbon, Tel Aviv, Lagos, Cape Town and Buenos
Aires. So much civilization; so much history. All those wars;
all those disputes and petty arguments; all those struggles to
save neighbourhoods, to create beautiful buildings - it was all
going to prove meaningless, as if it had never happened. It seemed
unbelievable - and yet we're seeing the evidence that it is happening
weekly, as great chunks of Antarctic ice-cliff crash into the
sea. What relevance are our personal lives, when such an enormous
catastrophe might engulf us ?
The thing which is the most alarming is that in the short term,
there appears to be nothing we can do to slow the melting. The
C02 and methane are in the atmosphere, and no-one can get them
out. There has been a suggestion that we should pump the oceans
full of artificial fertilizer to stimulate the growth of algae,
to suck the surplus atmospheric carbon dioxide out of the skies,
but that idea collapsed when its inventors realized that the resulting
algae bloom would suck the oxygen out of the oceans, starving
vast areas of marine life, and that the resulting die-off would
release more C02 than the algae would absorb.
Our only thread of hope seems to lie with the scientists' assertion
that a full ice-slip is still only a 'probability', not a fact.
It might not happen - but with the public becoming literate in
the language of baseline glacier inventories, subglacial trench
viscosity and the geography of the TransAntarctic Mountain range,
the pressure to take serious steps to eliminate fossils fuels
and start reforesting the world has become enormous. Here in Britain,
we are on target to eliminate fossil fuels by 2025, alongside
Germany, Holland, and most of the other European nations. The
solar revolution is in full swing. There are plans to solarize
every major road in the country over the next fifteen years, and
we've an outright ban on the sale of fossil-fuels coming into
effect in 2024. But globally, emissions are only 25% below their
2003 peak, so we have an enormous way to go.
It does seem as if things are beginning to shift, however. In
October, the new United Nations People's Assembly, with its thousand
delegates elected from every country in the world, held an Emergency
Session in Dakar, Bangladesh, to discuss a permanent close-down
of the world's fossil fuel industry. I wasn't able to go, but
several of my friends in the cabinet planning secretariat went,
so I had a first hand report on how it went.
The site was well-chosen - Bangladeshis need little persuading
about the perils of flooding. Every summer, typhoons surging up
the Bay of Bengal bring death and disaster, sweeping entire villages
away. Last year's typhoons drowned 120,000 people, which puts
other disasters into perspective. The public interest in the conference
was amazing; the conference home page received an astonishing
85 million visits. The crucial players were China, India and Indonesia,
who together produce 30% of the world's C02 emissions, and carry
40% of the Assembly's votes. In China, the adoption of the Internet
is raising the level of global literacy, so there's quite a high
level of awareness about climate change, and China's vulnerability
to the rising sea-levels. The Green Progress Movement is accelerating
their solar revolution, and most Chinese delegates seemed willing
to consider a phase-out, but not until 2040. The Indonesian delegates
followed the Chinese line, since most of Indonesia's agricultural
lands are vulnerable to flooding, including the capital, Jakarta.
India, on the other hand, is still very dependent on coal and
oil, which the World Bank has been encouraging for ages. Also,
the country is politically very confused, with religious and regional
tensions being exploited by extremist parties. The delegates elected
by the Hindu fundamentalist parties seemed to hate everything
western, and were suspicious that global warming was a myth that
was being put about by western interests to undermine India's
economy. India's geography, on the other hand, puts the Ganges
delta on the flood-list, including the sacred city of Benares.
The fundamentalists insisted that Mother Ganges would never allow
her sacred river to be destroyed, however, and refused to support
any initiative to reduce their use of fossil fuels.
The American delegates appeared equally confused. Those who were
elected on a Green Party ticket supported the phase out; that
was easy. At the other extreme, delegates from the New Christian
Party opposed any phase-out, arguing that man had been given fossil
fuels by God, and that if Noah could survive a flood, so could
man. The delegates from the Christian Destiny Party were even
worse, arguing that the floods had been prophesied in the Bible
as a sign of the Second Coming of Jesus, and that we should be
celebrating its arrival, not trying to forestall it. Pile on the
coal ! In the midst of all this, the Democrat and Republican delegates
struggled to sort out fact from fiction. My friends tell me that
it was embarrassing to see the delegates from other countries
laughing, and wondering how the great United States could have
produced such crazy people.
The sanity in all this came a the coalition of non-governmental
groups, including Greenpeace, and the Rocky Mountain Institute
in Colorado. They demonstrated that if everyone co-operated and
helped each other, and if an International Youth Corps were established
to take solar installation technology to the poorest regions of
the world, we could achieve a total worldwide phase-out of all
fossil fuels by 2020. The world's climate would not go back to
normal, but at least it might start to stabilize, instead of growing
worse with every passing year.
Their argument was that the benefits of the solar revolution
and global reforestation far outweighed the costs. Not only would
the risk of future losses be minimized, but the boost to economies
would create millions of jobs around the world. Don't worry about
Antarctica, they told everyone - just get on with the conversion
to a solar economy as fast as you can, because it makes sense
ecologically, economically, and in every other way.
The Greenpeace activists must have done some heavy duty lobbying
behind the scenes, because when the votes were in, the delegates
voted to go with the European targets, establishing a massive
Global Solar Fund to finance solar and wind technology transfer
to every country in the world, and phasing out all fossil fuels
by 2025. There were still some major hold-outs, including India
and the countries of the oil-rich Caspian region, but overall,
it was as good a result as we could have hoped for.
***
Before I finish, I must tell you about the Sirian Gatherings.
That's Sirian from the star system Sirius, not the country. The
Gatherings have been happening all over the world. They were billed
as a huge harmonic convergence, a preparation for the transformation
that was to happen on December 21st, when the Great Cycle of the
old Mayan calendar came to an end, and a new era of cosmogenesis
was to begin.
We took the whole family down to the gathering at Glastonbury,
in August. There must have been close to 300,000 people, camping
out, generally being peaceful, everything very well organized.
Some of the singing was amazing. We were suppose to be there to
welcome the Sirians, who were coming from the Pleiades to welcome
us to the galactic fold as the planet folded. Not in the flesh
- not many expected to see them in person - but in their 'transconsious
form', as you would expect of a Sirian. So what happened ? In
between the singing and the music, we sat and meditated, and lots
of people said they connected with other beings. What is fairly
remarkable is that many of the messages they received were too
similar to dismiss as private imaginings. The chance of this happening
on a random basis were astronomical, but there could have been
other sources of field consciousness at work.
As you know, the syntropic world view is very sympathetic to
the notion of field consciousness travel. If spiritual consciousness
is a unified phenomenon, it must by definition embrace the most
distant galaxies, as well as the Earth. The Sirians (assuming
they exist) must therefore share the same spiritual unity that
we do. By this token, any spiritual beings such as angels must
share the same unity. That is the idea behind the series of paintings
that the Dutch artist, Johanne Meertens, has been doing called
'Sirian Angel', 'Atrian Angel' and 'The Angel of Vega'. All this
has been fairly tough on the Catholic Church. There they are,
persisting with their belief that women should not be allowed
to serve as priests, while other churches are claiming to have
Aldebrans offering communion - and no-one even knows what
sex they are.
Were the Sirian messages real or imagined ? Some of the messages
were certainly very beautiful, but some were right off the deep
end, as if a cosmic psychopath had taken over the airwaves. I
put it down to learning. When we first discovered modern technology,
we went overboard, not knowing how ignorant we were. especially
of planetary ecology. It's going to be the same with spiritual
technology. We know almost nothing about the geography of psychospace,
the ecology of projected field consciousness or how to deal with
projected psychothugs. The potential for abuse is every bit as
great as it was with nuclear technology. We're going to have to
learn how to deal with psychic invasions, psychic treaties and
psychic defense initiatives - 'Finding the Chi in Machiavelli',
as one author has described it.
So you see, Anton, it's a strange, mixed-up world we have over
here. Everything seems to be bubbling to the boil at the same
time. But who ever said that the world would remain the same ?
Humans have been walking on two legs for how long - a million
years ? Three million ? Now think how the world has changed just
since the beginning of the industrial revolution, 200 years ago.
Maybe we are at the beginning of another whole revolution, focused
this time in human consciousness, not in matter; after that, there
will be another revolution, and then another, on into the limitless
future.
Where will it all end ? That's a bit like asking a single-celled
organism to imagine what it's going to be like to evolve into
a human. I'm sure we've many million years to go yet. My personal
feeling is that we've only just begun.
So, my dear Anton - take good care of yourself and your lovely
wife and children. Spring will be here soon !
Your good friend,
Malcolm
About the author
Guy Dauncey is an author, organizer and sustainable communities
consultant who specializes in developing a positive vision of
an environmentally sustainable future, and translating that vision
into action. He is the author of Stormy Weather : 101 Solutions
to Global Climate Change (New Society Publishers, July 2001),
and ‘A Sustainable Energy Plan for the US’ (Earth Island
Journal, August 2003). He is also the publisher of EcoNews (a
monthly newsletter), co-founder of the Victoria Car-Share Cooperative,
and a consultant in ecovillage and green building development.
He lives in Victoria, on the west coast of Canada.
His website is www.earthfuture.com.
|