|
Extract from ‘Journey into the
Future’
(an unpublished novel by Guy Dauncey)
*
There's one thing about George which I don't think I've yet told
you. You remember how he used to be a leading biologist, always
going off on trips into the field, loving nature, and generally
exploring every mountain and valley he could find ? He was a scientist,
through and through, but a scientist who kept alive his sense
of awe and spiritual wonder at the miracles and mysteries of nature.
And then he had his accident, when he fell and broke his spine,
cutting the nerves to his legs.
In the days immediately following the accident, George was in
Victoria General Hospital, drugged both against pain and infection.
He had suffered severe concussion, too, and for several days he
drifted in and out of consciousness, and there was a time when
when the medical staff thought they would lose him. It was on
one of these occasions, as George told me several years later,
that he found himself one night suddenly leaving his body, as
if in a silent but utterly peaceful rush of wind. From then on,
it was all more or less according to the book. George had studied
many accounts of near-death experiences, especially in the work
of Elizabeth Kubler-Ross, and he said that it felt like very familiar
territory as he saw his body lying there in tbe bed below, and
the cards beside his bed. Looking upwards, he encountered a rushing
dark tunnel, and at the end, a gleaming light which pulled him
upwards. Forever the scientist, he looked around very carefully,
and even paused, to examine the sides of the tunnel, something
he had always been curious about, since no-one had ever written
about them. It started off seeming to be a solid black, but as
he looked, holding his focus carefully on a single area, the darkness
seemed to grow deeper, and in the depth, he saw a spiral pattern
in which a thousand events from his life were being simultaneously
replayed, some spiraling upwards, some spiraling downwards. He
said that he felt he was just on the verge of understanding something
very profound when suddenly his gaze was pulled away, and he was
rushing up to the top of the tunnel, where he found himself standing
in this incredibly bright, sparkling meadow, surrounded by flowers
that he knew - but each of them was like a flower of light, not
of actual substance. Then a presence spoke to him, from nowhere,
and he knew that he had a choice, either to stay, or to return.
He knew inside that he wanted to return, back to the farm, back
to Carl and Maria, but the feeling of love he encountered in that
presence was so immense, so total, and so unconditionally loving
that he longed to stay, and live forever in this place.
When he finally left the spinal injuries unit, George started
reading. For the first time in ages, he had time on his hands,
and some huge questions to explore. What was this spiritual
world, that he had so dramatically encountered ? How did that
world and this relate ? And why did he so often feel that same
inner peace, that sense of love, when he was ssurrounded by flowers
?
One morning, about a year after his accident, he was sitting
on the porch one early morning, enjoying a cup of coffee, feeling
happy and relaxed. His eyes took in the summer splendour - the
soft rolling ease of the meadow, the raspberries waving in the
breeze, the hum of the bees around the fennel plants. Then somehow,
as if he was in a trance, every leaf came slowly alive, sparkling
with light. He was entranced, and as he looked, he saw that the
edge of every leaf had a fringe of glowing light that seemed to
radiate inwards to the plant - or was it outwards ? The experience
lasted a few minutes, then faded away.
In the following weeks, George read everything he could about
the aura, the subtle energy the Chinese call ch'i, and about a
technique called Kirlian photography, which appeared to photograph
the aura of a plant, or the human body. The amount of literature
on the subject was enormous. Most of it was descriptive, but when
an author became more adventurous, he or she would have a go at
inventing a new theory to explain it all. Five years ago, he would
have called it wacko, and joked to his scientific colleagues about
it, calling it pseudo-science. Now, he was reading in a new light
- literally.
The question that was never addressed, however, was the evolutionary
one. If all matter was pervaded with spirit, and if spirit had
the ability to communicate with matter in a seemingly extradimensional
way, was this a new phenomenon, which had only recently started
happening - or had this happened throughout evolution ? His instincts
as a scientist told him that it must be an inherent quality of
matter, not a recent development. In evolutionary time those leaves
were how old - 500 million years ? Two thousand million ? And
if they flickered, might not that flickering belong to all matter
? The leaves were descended from the earliest blue-green algae,
which had emerged from the ocean 2 billion years ago. Did the
algae too possess that light ? Going further back, did life itself
? Did matter ? When he read about pieces of rock that had been
photographed.....******
Turning the evolutionary clock the other way, what did this mean
for species that had emerged since the leaves - including
humans ? Were we infused with this flickering light too, throughout
the cells of our bodies ? Traditional Chinese medicine certainly
thought so : acupuncture was based on this very premise. But for
George, everything now went a whole lot further. When he left
his body that night in the hospital, what was it that left
? His more sceptical colleagues would say he had simply dreamt,
or imagined it. Dreams can be awfully vivid, after all. But George
knew this was a different league from dreams. He had never looked
down on his body in a dream - or heard the conversations of the
night nurses. He knew that whatever had left his body was its
very essence, leaving only the shell behind.
In his spiritual self, he was content with the experience. He
had few questions, no scepticisms. The experience belonged in
a place beyond those kind of questions. But his scientific self
kept pushing at the door, demanding to be let in. What does
it mean, if I, as a biological species descended from and related
to a billion other biological species, can leave my body, and
travel to a realm of light ? What did that mean for evolution,
and the origins of life ? Or, going much further back in time,
what did it mean for the original Big Bang ? And even if there
wasn't a big bang, but some continual kind of cosmic creation
at the beginning of time, what did it mean for that ? Was all
matter, of every kind, enfused with this same quality of light
? Was the big bang itself, perhaps, the actual process of infusion,
when light poured into whatever was lightless and sent it rushing
on its journey through the cosmos and its eventual unfolding into
this daisy, that butterfly - that smile on my daughter's face
?
In evolution, whatever biologists said about change being a random
process of mutations and natural selection, based on the survival
of the fittest, there was an undeniable build-up of complexity,
which was never reversed. Evolution moved forwards, from
atom to molecule, from single-celled to multi-celled, from the
elementary nervous system of a plankton to the 20 billion-celled
complexity of the human brain. The process was anti-entropic :
it defied the supposedly inevitable breakdown that was engraved
in stone in the Second Law of Thermodynamics. This thought itself
was a product of evolution - and the music that Schubert had composed
that Dawn was practising on the piano upstairs. Was it simply
organized atoms that wrote that Impromptu ? Yes, if you took genetic
theory literally. But that was equivalent to the Ptolemaic insistence
that the stars were permanently fixed in the firmament. So where
did poetry, love and imagination come from ? If they
were not were just organized atoms, what else were they ? Almost
all modern biologists avoided the questions by ignoring them.
Scientifically speaking, under the current evolutionary theory,
human beings stopped evolving 100,000 years ago. Our brains have
shown no increase in size or capacity since then, so what evidence
is there we are still evolving ? By neo-Darwinian evolutionary
theory, if evolution is to happen, the individuals of a species
have to suffer a massive rate of death before they breed, and
a mutant variety has to have a trick up its sleeve which enables
it to survive and pass on its mutant genes : then, and only then
can evolution happen. Once a species finds a way to defeat early
death, so that they consistently pass on their genes, according
to the theory, the opportunities for further evolution disappear.
As long as the old genes are being passed on successfully, new
genes may arise by chance, but they have no possible chance to
take over the species. By this logic, humans are no longer evolving.
So according to the standard theory of evolution, which guides
all science, and informs all chemistry and biology, we are no
longer evolving : the billion-year process that made us what we
are has stopped. No wonder many Christians reject the theory in
favour of the Biblical story. At least that contains an active
spiritual component.
And yet ..... all our civilization, all our history....every
development and change that humans have created over the past
100,000 years...if this is not evolution, what is it ? What motivates
it ? And why, it must be asked, do humans always push their hopes
and dreams in the direction of an ideal, for justice, for peace,
for beauty ? Why should we bother ? What drives us ?
Now that he was temporarily out of his professional career, George
lived with a much more acute awareness of the growing crisis in
the world. And now that he knew that every tree, every flower
and every sheep in the field was permeated with light, with being,
George the scientist could no longer ignore these questions. He
read, he thought, he kept notes in his journal. The calm of their
Cowichan Valley farm was the most peaceful he could wish for;
the shaded porch of their old Victorian house the most tranquil
he could wish for. For hours every day, while Maria and the girls
were busy around the farm, and Carl was away at school, he would
immerse himself in reading. Over the last 40 years, he discovered,
an entire stream of research had been conducted into the nature
of consciousness, and the relationship of consciousness to healing,
energy, even to prayer. All his reading, all his thoughts, guided
him in one direction : to the realization that the process of
evolution was pushed, informed and guided not only to greater
physical complexity, but also to greater psychic complexity.
With each increase in complexity, the 'within-ness' of life seemed
also to grow richer. Our human struggle to understand our life,
to improve it, to reach for new frontiers - all this seemed surely
to be an expression of evolution at work, pushing us to overcome
limits, to reach greater wholeness. The stupidity, evil and cruelty
that humans displayed so constantly was not so much an evidence
of inherent directionless in the human species, as it was of our
loss of direction, of our failure to understand the laws
that governed evolution.
While George spent his summer days reading, thinking, and pondering
great thoughts in the shade of the porch, Maria was out in the
fields among the beans, her hands buried in the strawberry beds,
her mind juggling the competing demands of the crops, the watering,
the orders that had to be filled. She loved the work, even when
her body ached at the end of the day, but she never grudged George
his time of thinking, his flying to distant places in the universe.
Her Austro-German upbringing taught her to be wary of idealism,
however, and constantly at watch for the sinister shape of the
shadow emerging from the mud of the human soul; but it also offered
her the traditions of Goethe, Schiller, Beethoven and Mozart.
Her own soul ran deep, but she preferred not to speak of it. Her
Catholic faith gave her an outlet for a very private love; to
talk of it to others, she always felt, would weaken or threaten
it. Alone in the semi-darkness of a church, she could indulge
it. Her one sadness about living in Canada was the lack of the
great old European churches, where the depth of time and accumulated
sorrow provided a glorious haven for the soul. But with the glory
of the country fields, the sparkling rivers and the green forested
mountains all around her, who could complain ?
*
I was there when Maria came back from the Farmers Market just
a week before Christmas in 2005, carrying a copy of Time Magazine,
her face flushed with excitement. As I recall it, the conversation
went something like this :
"George ! George ! Have you seen this ?"
"What's that ? Something up ?", his voice came from somewhere
in the house.
"This - look ! It's Time Magazine. Have you seen it ? Where are
you, for heavens sake ?"
"I'm here, I'm here", he said, emerging from the bathroom. "What
is it ?"
"Time Magazine ! It's on the front page ! All this stuff you've
been talking about ! Take a look. It's amazing ! They're saying......"
"Wait a moment, please. Let me see."
On the cover, set against the background of the universe, was
a spiral diagram showing a swirl of great thinkers and scientists,
growing smaller as they disappeared into the past. At the centre
of the spiral was a human heart set, within the infinity symbol,
surrounded by the photos of the five people who had been involved,
led by the renowned Franco-Pakistani neurologist, Jean Marc Kharoun.
At the top of the page were the words 'Syntropy : A New Evolutionary
Force', and at the bottom, the words :
'The implications of this discovery for science, and indeed for
the whole cosmological foundation on which science has been based
since the 17th century, are nothing short of stupendous. We have
entered a new era of human knowledge and discovery.'
George opened the magazine, and turned to eight pages which focussed
on the story. For the next hour, he was engrossed. Finally, he
put the magazine down and wheeled himself onto the porch, where
Dawn, Khalil, Maria and myself were enjoying a coffee, after eating
lunch. George had missed lunch entirely.
"So, what does it say ? It is the same stuff you've been working
on ?" Maria asked.
"Yes - it's incredible ! Basically, they are reporting on a major
paper that has just been published in three scientific journals,
simultaneously, which is itself unheard of. The five authors have
been working together over the past few years on a series of experiments.
The experiments are the smaller part of the story : they are around
the immune system, and the comparative effects of attitude, diet,
self-esteem, stress, healing, deep meditation and prayer. They've
been doing their work with humans, with rats, and with cell-cultures.
They are showing beyond any reasonable doubt that there is evidence
for the mind's role in influencing cell-division and cellular
strength, and that spiritual healing and prayer have a specific,
measurable effect on the human immune system."
"We knew that," Maria said. "So what's new ?"
"Well, first of all, we may have known that, but most
people don't. Anyway, let me get on with the story. The research
is good, but as you say, it's not new : there has been research
showing similar results over the past ten or fifteen years. What
makes the story is that Jean-Marc and his team have had the courage
to step back and see how their findings fit into the larger picture
- evolution itself. And basically, they have found they don't.
There is no place for attitudinal change as a parameter of cellular
change within orthodox evolutionary theory. So taking the Anthropic
Principle, which says there is no way evolution could have arrived
at our present situation by chance alone, they have turned the
whole of science on its head by showing that given the evidence,
there must have been a mental or spiritual force at work throughout
evolution. The burden of proof, they are saying, is now on the
Darwinians to prove that the world is a solely material place,
not vice-versa. The name they give to this force is syntropy,
contrasting it directly with entropy. Whereas entropy is the inherent
tendency of all living matter to collapse, they say, syntropy
is the inherent tendency of the spirit within all living matter
to reach towards wholeness."
"The incredible thing is that in the very week when these five
published their paper in Nature, a Greek scientist living
in New York, called Elizabeth Mitchell, published a paper in the
Scientific American proposing almost exactly the same thing.
She calls it the 'chi-anthropic principle', combining the Chinese
principle of 'chi', meaning the life force within matter, with
the anthropic principle. Apparently, there's been no communication
between them, and they just happened to publish at the same time.
"That's amazing", Maria said. "If they are going to rewrite evolutionary
theory to include spiritual life, won't they have to rewrite the
whole of physics, chemistry, biology, and everything else ?"
"Yes ! Just listen to these reviews their papers have been getting
:
'This would seem to prove, beyond any reasonable doubt, that
consciousness has a real and active role in biological processes
that were previously thought to be self-governing.' New York Times
'If this is true, we will have to rewrite every book of science.'
Nature.
'The challenge facing young scientists today is stupendous :
it involves the re-thinking and re-formulation of every known
theory, law and principle in the scientific cosmology. Nothing
- and everything - should be seen as sacred : the sacred itself
must now be included in the scientific endeavour.' New Scientist
"So !" Maria laughed. "This is wonderful good news. Maybe now
they will take our spiritual life more seriously, and stop messing
around with so many chemicals and drugs in their attempt to make
better food. Don't they know that Nature makes the best food ?
Now maybe there will be papers written on the spiritual power
of compost. That is so good !"
"But according to this, the church doesn't think it's good at
all."
"Which church ? Who doesn't think it's good ?"
"Well, none of them, apparently. This is a review that has been
specially written for Time magazine by the editors of Christianity
Today."
"This work demonstrates the enormous dangers of meddling in the
works of God. The leaders of the scientific community must take
great care that they do not unwittingly endorse every crackpot
piece of new age nonsense, before they find themselves giving
their blessing to works of healing that come from elsewhere than
the Lord, and his one and only chosen Son, Jesus. The time has
come for all responsible Christians to stand up and say 'Enough
!'. We should render unto God that which is God's. Science has
no business meddling in the affairs of the human spirit."
Christianity Today
"They sound like they are still living in the seventeenth century",
Maria said.
"Quite so. But that would fit with that letter you received last
year sent out by a fundamentalist Christian gardener, attacking
organic farming as being Nature worship, and a terrible pagan
influence."
"But he's crazy. You should hear him go on. He thinks that talking
to the plants is a kind of devil worship. I've no idea what he's
doing being a gardener at all."
"Well, it takes all types; and don't mock him - I hear that he
grows very good crops. I expect he prays for them. According to
the new theory, that would be an excellent way to grow food."
"So George, this must be very exciting for you. All your work
has been vindicated !"
"Yes ! This is so big, it will have a thousand effects. From
this moment forth, all human history will be different ! It is
like when we saw Earth from Space for the first time : it changed
our whole way of thinking about Earth, which now see as our home.
This is like seeing our true origins for the first time. It will
change the entire way we think about ourselves, and our future.
It will bring the future back to life again ! If evolution contains
a spiritual process built right into the nature of matter, then
we ourselves contain the same process. Along with everything else,
it must affect the way we perceive the future. How can we be cynical,
or negative, if science says we contain a spiritual force which
has been responsible for the whole of evolution, for over 15 thousand
billion years ? That's quite a fuel. Oh - my mind is bubbling
! I need to move. I think I'll go for a roll up the road to get
some air."
That was how syntropy arrived at Stable Farm. That week, in households
across the world, Time Magazine was read by some five million
people - and as word of the story spread, the magazine was forced
to issue a reprint, just of the story, and then another. All told,
I think they printed some twenty million copies.
During Christmas week, there was a big radio documentary on the
breakthrough, and for a short while, newspapers provided serious
coverage of the new theory. Then one of the scientists made the
mistake of appearing as a guest on a late night chat-show, where
he had to endure the host jesting that the syntropic principle
seemed to be pandering to the new age public. The mass media wrapped
it up as the latest sensation, like the wristwatch that doubled
as a cellular phone (and gave you bone-marrow cancer of the wrist).
They knew they had to cover the story, but they completely failed
to grasp what it was all about.
On Christmas Day, when the Pope did his usual Vatican appearance,
he made an extraordinary statement in which he said that while
this new syntropic principle might seem to provide important scientific
validation of the role of prayer, the Holy Father could not allow
the promulgation of any theory which tried to take away from God
the prime role in Creation, or which suggested that ordinary mortals
might share the spark of divinity.
"The divinity is only within God, his only beloved Son Jesus,
and Mary, the Mother of Jesus - and with the appointed saints
and apostles - not within every child of God. That is the role
of our glorious mother church, to raise our children to salvation
through the knowledge of God. The scientists should study the
realms of matter, and the measurable world. It is not their role
to enter into the realm of the unmeasurable. That is sacred, not
to be played with. I declare this new theory of syntropy a heresy,
at variance with the written doctrines of the Holy Catholic Church."
'This would seem to prove, beyond any reasonable doubt, that
consciousness has a real and active role in biological processes
that were previously thought to be self-governing.' New York Times
'If this is true, we will have to rewrite every book of science.'
Nature.
'The challenge facing young scientists today is stupendous :
it involves the re-thinking and re-formulation of every known
theory, law and principle in the scientific cosmology. Nothing
- and everything - should be seen as sacred : the sacred itself
must now be included in the scientific endeavour.' New Scientist
"So !" Maria laughed. "This is wonderful good news. Maybe now
they will take our spiritual life more seriously, and stop messing
around with so many chemicals and drugs in their attempt to make
better food. Don't they know that Nature makes the best food ?
Now maybe there will be papers written on the spiritual power
of compost. That is so good !"
"But according to this, the church doesn't think it's good at
all."
"Which church ? Who doesn't think it's good ?"
"Well, none of them, apparently. This is a review that has been
specially written for Time magazine by the editors of Christianity
Today."
"This work demonstrates the enormous dangers of meddling in the
works of God. The leaders of the scientific community must take
great care that they do not unwittingly endorse every crackpot
piece of new age nonsense, before they find themselves giving
their blessing to works of healing that come from elsewhere than
the Lord, and his one and only chosen Son, Jesus. The time has
come for all responsible Christians to stand up and say 'Enough
!'. We should render unto God that which is God's. Science has
no business meddling in the affairs of the human spirit."
Christianity Today
About the author
Guy Dauncey is an author, organizer and sustainable communities
consultant who specializes in developing a positive vision of
an environmentally sustainable future, and translating that vision
into action. He is the author of Stormy Weather : 101 Solutions
to Global Climate Change (New Society Publishers, July 2001),
and ‘A Sustainable Energy Plan for the US’ (Earth Island
Journal, August 2003). He is also the publisher of EcoNews (a
monthly newsletter), co-founder of the Victoria Car-Share Cooperative,
and a consultant in ecovillage and green building development.
He lives in Victoria, on the west coast of Canada.
His website is www.earthfuture.com. |